#GOLAND COMMUNITY CODE#

Department of Water & Power (1977) 69 Cal.App.3d 670, 675 Stencel Aero Engineering v. In reviewing an order granting a motion for judgment on the pleadings, we accept as true all material allegations in the complaint. Because the conduct at issue here was not privileged under section 47(2), the judgment of the Court of Appeal is affirmed and the case is remanded for trial. 2 Our holding is limited to the narrow facts before us involving noncommunicative acts - the illegal recording of confidential telephone conversations - for the purpose of gathering evidence to be used in future litigation. We conclude that the privilege of section 47(2) precludes recovery for tortiously inflicted injury resulting from publications or broadcasts made during the course of judicial and quasi-judicial proceedings, but does not bar recovery for injuries from tortious conduct regardless of the purpose for which such conduct is undertaken.

1 shields a person from liability for the unlawful recording, in anticipation of litigation, of confidential telephone conversations.

#GOLAND COMMUNITY CODE#

In this case we are called upon to determine whether the privilege of Civil Code section 47, subdivision 2, fn. Bedard as Amici Curiae on behalf of Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents. Solish, Jordan & Wiener, Jonathan Solish and Douglas P. per., for Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents.

Mink for Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants.Ĭotkin, Collins & Franscell, William D. (Opinion by Arabian, J., expressing the unanimous view of the court.) RICHARD FARNELL, Cross-defendant and Respondent GOLAND, as Trustee, etc., et al., Defendants, Cross-complainants and Appellants R.

KIMMEL et al., Plaintiffs, Cross-defendants and Respondents, v.

Goland community